MarkScanner

Worked example · Grade 9 math (MTH1W) style

Solving and checking an equation with fractions: four students, one rubric

Two students reach the right answer by different methods. Two get it wrong in different places. One of them checked her answer, and the check told her something was off. Here is how a rubric that rewards the check, a teacher’s review, and specific feedback turn four papers into four different next steps.

By Oscar ONeill ·

The question

What the students were asked

Quiz question

Solve and check: (x + 1) / 2 = (x − 3) / 3 + 2

[4 marks]

Teacher's answer key

  1. 6 · (x + 1)/2 = 6 · (x − 3)/3 + 6 · 2
  2. 3(x + 1) = 2(x − 3) + 12
  3. 3x + 3 = 2x + 6
  4. x = 3
  5. Check: LS = 4/2 = 2, RS = 0/3 + 2 = 2 ✓

The rubric

The marking criteria the teacher approved

MarkScanner drafts a rubric from the teacher’s test and answer key. The teacher edits it and approves it, and the final marks follow it. This is one reasonable rubric for this question, not the only one.

Rubric items and marks
Item What earns the mark Marks
A Clears the fractions by multiplying every term by a common denominator, or works with the fractions correctly. 1
B Reaches a correct equation without fractions, such as 3x + 3 = 2x + 6, or an equivalent one. 1
C Solves for x. Follow-through applies: correct solving from the student’s own equation earns this mark. 1
D Checks by substituting into the original equation and evaluating both sides. 1

Decisions the teacher made before marking

  • Any valid method earns A and B. Clearing the fractions is not required.
  • Item D is required because the question says “check”. A check done correctly earns D even when it shows the answer is wrong.
  • Follow-through applies to item C.

Another teacher could reasonably decide differently. What matters is deciding before marking, so every paper gets the same decision.

Four responses

The students' work, the draft marks, and the teacher's review

Each response is transcribed line by line. Under it: the marks for each rubric item, and what happened when the teacher reviewed the draft. In MarkScanner, nothing is final until the teacher approves it.

Amara

Clears the fractions, then checks

Final mark: 4/4

Student working, line by line:

  1. 6 · (x + 1)/2 = 6 · (x − 3)/3 + 6 · 2
  2. 3(x + 1) = 2(x − 3) + 12
  3. 3x + 3 = 2x − 6 + 12
  4. 3x + 3 = 2x + 6
  5. x = 3
  6. LS = 4/2 = 2, RS = 0/3 + 2 = 2 ✓
Marks by rubric item for Amara
A Earned 1/1
B Earned 1/1
C Earned 1/1
D Earned 1/1
Teacher review

No flag. The teacher agreed with the draft.

Ben

Works with the fractions directly, no check

Final mark: 3/4

Student working, line by line:

  1. x/2 + 1/2 = x/3 − 1 + 2
  2. x/2 − x/3 = 1 − 1/2
  3. 3x/6 − 2x/6 = 1/2
  4. x/6 = 1/2
  5. x = 3
Marks by rubric item for Ben
A Valid method: works with the fractions correctly. 1/1
B x/6 = 1/2 is an equivalent equation. 1/1
C Earned 1/1
D No check, and the question asked for one. 0/1
Teacher review

Flagged because the method isn’t the one in the answer key. The teacher confirmed it’s valid and kept items A and B.

Chloe

Clears the fractions, misses one term

Final mark: 2/4

Student working, line by line:

  1. 6 · (x + 1)/2 = 6 · (x − 3)/3 + 2 the 2 also gets ×6
  2. 3x + 3 = 2x − 6 + 2
  3. 3x + 3 = 2x − 4
  4. x = −7
  5. LS = −6/2 = −3, RS = −10/3 + 2 = −4/3
  6. −3 ≠ −4/3 ??
Marks by rubric item for Chloe
A The + 2 wasn’t multiplied by 6. 0/1
B Not earned 0/1
C Follow-through: x = −7 is correct from 3x + 3 = 2x − 4. 1/1
D A correct check that shows a mismatch. 1/1
Teacher review

No flag. The teacher agreed with the draft, including item D: Chloe’s check is done correctly, and it shows her answer doesn’t work.

Dev

Clears the fractions, sign slip, no check

Final mark: 2/4

Student working, line by line:

  1. 3(x + 1) = 2(x − 3) + 12
  2. 3x + 3 = 2x + 6
  3. 3x − 2x = 6 + 3 6 − 3
  4. x = 9
Marks by rubric item for Dev
A Earned 1/1
B Earned 1/1
C Moving + 3 across should give 6 − 3. 0/1
D No check. 0/1
Teacher review

No flag. The teacher agreed with the draft.

Same mark, different next step

Chloe and Dev both scored 2/4. Chloe’s problem is in the first line: she didn’t multiply every term. Dev’s first two lines are correct, and his problem is moving a term across the equals sign. A gradebook shows two identical marks. The written steps show two different lessons.

Why the check deserves its mark

Chloe’s check caught her error. Dev skipped the check, and it would have caught his. Rewarding the check, even when it reveals a wrong answer, tells students it’s a tool for finding mistakes rather than a box to tick.

Feedback

What each student reads

A mark says how much. Feedback should say what worked, where to look again, and one thing to try next. MarkScanner drafts comments in this pattern; the teacher edits them before anything is printed. These are written for this example.

Amara

4/4

What worked
Every step is clear, and your check uses the original equation, so it really tests your answer.
Where to look again
Nothing to fix on this question.
What to try next
Solve it a second way, working with the fractions directly, and see that you get the same answer.

Ben

3/4

What worked
Working with the fractions directly is a valid method, and every step is correct.
Where to look again
The question asked you to check. Substitute x = 3 into the original equation and show both sides.
What to try next
Add a check line to every “solve” question: substitute, work out each side, and compare.

Chloe

2/4

What worked
Your check was done properly, and it told you something was wrong. That’s exactly what a check is for.
Where to look again
Line 1: you multiplied both fractions by 6 but not the + 2. Every term on both sides gets multiplied.
What to try next
Redo line 1 with 6 · 2 = 12. When a check fails, go back to the first line where you changed the equation.

Dev

2/4

What worked
You cleared the fractions correctly and simplified to 3x + 3 = 2x + 6.
Where to look again
Line 3: moving + 3 to the other side means subtracting 3, so it becomes 6 − 3.
What to try next
Check your answer in the original equation: x = 9 gives 5 on the left and 4 on the right, so something needs fixing.

After the quiz

A follow-up question for fresh evidence

A corrected answer shows a student can fix this question. A new question with different numbers shows whether the idea has landed. The teacher gives this one in class after the papers go back.

Solve and check: (x − 2) / 4 = (x + 1) / 2 − 3

Show the answer

x − 2 = 2(x + 1) − 12, so x = 8. Check: LS = 6/4 = 3/2, RS = 9/2 − 3 = 3/2 ✓

A constant term again sits outside the fractions (the − 3), so Chloe has to multiply it too, and Dev has to move terms carefully and check.

More on this routine: math test corrections that give you new evidence.

What this doesn't show

One question is one piece of evidence

A marked question shows what a student wrote on one day. It doesn’t show everything they understand, and two students with the same mark can need very different help. The conversation in class and the next piece of work still matter.

Real student work is also messier than these transcriptions. When MarkScanner can’t read something clearly, or its draft looks doubtful, it flags the answer for you. An answer without a flag can still be wrong, so the teacher’s review is part of the workflow, not an extra.

More examples

Other worked examples

Try it free

Try MarkScanner with your next quiz or test

Use your own account and your own papers. You approve the rubric, review the draft marks, and decide what goes back to students.

Email us and we’ll set up your account and help with your first assessment.

After your trial, $49 CAD/month plus HST per teacher.